| The
world is now integrating economically into a single
world-wide market. This essential aspect of the present
globalization process is strongly encouraged by the
availability of ICT and its ability to eliminate distance.
The opposite of sustainability
is extinction. Any consideration of the information
society must take this into account. Environmental issues
often have to do with costs and competitiveness.
World market conditions strongly
influence environmental matters and many other aspects
of life for members of the information society. By far
the strongest existing frameworks for the global market
are the World Trade Organisation (WTO), the rules of
the world financial markets, and other organizations
such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
|
Many
of the possibilities it opens for an improved life for
all are connected with the positive features of globalization.
Most of the challenges it poses demand global solutions,
and these require a new international framework that
deals fully with the economic, social, cultural and
environmental needs and concerns of the members of the
global information society.
Physical access is necessary but not sufficient for
full participation. To avoid the risk of public mistrust
in new services, a firm civil rights approach is necessary
to guarantee both consumer confidence and fundamental
matters such as privacy. This is central to the European
conception of the rights of the individual.
Information and Communication Technology
(ICT) has a central - perhaps predominant - role to
play in eventually reaching sustainability and improvements
in the quality of life. The Forum takes the position
that whether we can reach a sustainable state will be
decided in the course of shaping the future information
society.
On the one hand, these technologies
are major drivers of economic globalization. Because
of this they are now indirectly causing additional social
and environmental burdens world-wide.
This is typical of so-called rebound effects of technological
progress. A particular technology may enable a particular
good or service to be produced with the consumption
of fewer material resources; but if it stimulates demand,
including demand for other technologies, it may increase
total resource use. Large numbers of people traveling
to meetings that discuss the information society could
be taken as an ironic example.
On the other hand, these technologies
offer, in principle, huge opportunities for overcoming
social exclusion, for supporting cultural diversity,
for stimulating the economy and for reducing environmental
burdens by increasing material productivity. While this
so-called dematerialization is a typical, promising
feature of most technological progress, ICT has by far
the highest potential in this regard. On top of that,
ICT is the technological basis for an open worldwide
information and knowledge society, and it is in this
context that our mental images for the future will be
shaped.
Whether information and communication
technologies will lead to more sustainability, or not,
essentially depends on the further development of the
global economic and societal frameworks within which
they are deployed, and on corresponding attitudes and
values. Why do we need new frameworks - is something
lacking in global governance? Building such frameworks
is the single most important challenge to politics and
societies entering the 21st century. Such frameworks
require more than ideas: development along sustainable
and equitable lines needs transfers of resources. We
need global instruments that commit the industrialized
states to support and co-finance social and ecological
developments and improve standards, in countries in
transition and in developing countries. In the long
run, the result is likely to be something like a global
civil society and a global citizenship.
|