Subscribe now and get the latest ICT news to your inbox for free!                    
Telecom Franchise in Nigeria - Yusuf Sanni.
Nigeria is more than  ripe for e-banking services - Woherem.
NIGCOMSAT-1
Telecoms around the world.
Africa.
Nigeria.
Computing and Networking.
Pathway to a rewarding IT career - Julius Ayuk Tabe.
Advert Rates / Subscription
BROADCASTING

Pay Tv
Sad Story of a Dying Industry

     
Like a flash in the pan, they come and disappear into oblivion leaving their subscribers in the dark. Yet, like motherless babies, nobody is bothered about their survival in an industry that is driven by content and good programming. They are like landlords who are strangled to death by visitors in their own homes. Their story is both pathetic and indicting. In the following report, YUSUF SANNI makes an expose of an industry that seems hostile to indigenous operators.
               
           
                           
 
 

The Prophecy
He saw it coming, and like the biblical John the Baptist described as the fore-runner of Jesus Christ, Otunba Reuben Boye Famuyibo fore-warned against what he termed the 'grave consequences' of allowing the Direct-To-Home (DTH) Pay-TV industry in Nigeria, die a premature death. He was particularly concerned about the extinct future of the indigenous operators.

Like the famous French seer, Nostradamus, Famuyibo, in what looked like someone guided by the crystal ball prophesied the precarious state in which the DTH Pay-TV Industry in Nigeria was about finding itself.

 
Archive
April 2008 Edition
         
...read now
 
April 2008 Edition
         
...read now
 
March 2008 Edition
         
...read now
 
October/November 2007 Edition
         
...read now
 
He had warned that unless adequate steps were deployed to check what he called the 'excesses of foreign satellite TV channels', the industry was only begging for time to die a rather preventive death. In business, except for competing in the market over the control of crowded TV channels being beamed to their subscribers, Frontage Satellite Television (FSTV) and Trumpet Internet Television (TITV) had no other thing in common. Each independently pursued its own business plans. But today, both Pay-TV stations share one thing in common-they are all gone under and have at least for now, entered into the history books. Famuyibo's prophecy has come to pass. It is close to two years now since the Famuyibo- led Frontage Satellite Television (FSTV) packed up owing to certain factors beyond its control. And in what looked like a year of the death-knell on local Pay-TV stations in Nigeria, Trumpet Internet Television (TITV) which pioneered the combination of broadcasting and Internet services in one offering immediately followed suit.

It unceremoniously closed shop in Nigeria. Between the last two years and now, Trend TV, another DTH Pay-TV provider owned by Communication Trends Limited (CTL) has not had the best of times. The Cable TV has graduated from one problem to the other, closing shop at some instance and going off air unannounced at other times.

 

Why these sudden deaths?

In an interview he granted a Lagos based specialized journal about two years ago, former managing director of now moribund Trumpet Internet TV (TITV), American born Nathan Garner was short of shedding tears when he confessed that outside of MultiChoice, other Pay-TV Stations in Nigeria were only business spectators.

“We are nowhere at the moment; our numbers are so small that you couldn't calculate the market penetration. That's true of FSTV as well as Trend TV; all of these companies put together have no market share”, he had lamented.

Pay-TV subscribers have argued that the major reason why local Pay-TV Stations have found it difficult to survive in the country was not unconnected with content quality. This to a large extent could be true as MultiChoice had before now been enjoying an uninterrupted exclusivity in the matter of some foreign channels and content in the DSTV bouquet. Those channels are described as premium channels in broadcast and entertainment circles.

The SuperSports Channel for instance attracts the biggest patronage in the MultiChoice offering because of the station's transmission of the English Football Premiership as well as the European Championships. MultiChoice has exclusive right to transmit this South African Channel, a right other Pay-TV Stations in the country does not enjoy for now.
And because a greater percentage of the gross patronage rate of MultiChoice is

 
attributed to the patronage enjoyed by SuperSports, analysts believe that only a chunk of the Nigerian Pay-TV audience is left for MultiChoice rivals. Consequently, little or no revenue come to those stations resulting to their pre-mature deaths, as means of sustenance has been lost.
In fact, MultiChoice has been accused severally of being a monopoly because of its firm grip of some of the popular and most patronized stations in the world. In South Africa where Multi Choice originates from, the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), the body that regulates broadcasting and other related communications matters in the country has always claimed its readiness
to encourage fair competition in broadcasting in the Nelson Mandela's Country, claiming that it would not allow the industry to be controlled by foreigners. Yet, in Nigeria, every premium channel is allegedly the exclusive turf of MultiChoice thus making it practically impossible for other operators, majority of which are local service providers, to survive in the business. It has therefore, been accused of claiming undue franchise for beaming popular channels. But MultiChoice Nigeria has however, been denying that it is monopolistic.Its public relations and media officer, Segun Fayose rather carries the blame on the company of being a monopoly to the doorsteps of people who are deliberately misinforming the public for personal reasons.
He argues that in a country with about 20 licensed Pay-TV stations, it is improper to tag a particular outfit a monopoly.
“The point is that we've never been a monopoly; we came into this business in 1994 as an analogue company where we had about two or three other companies firmly entrenched in the Nigerian market. When we upgraded to the digital satellite platform, people said we are the only one in the Direct-To-Home arm of the Pay-TV
 
business in a market of over 12,000 channels.
“You buy these channels and promote; you publicize and you market them and then make it available to subscribers. Now, if we make these channels popular to the extent that all our competitors now want those channels, the people should first give us kudos; but it does not mean monopoly”, Fayose notes.

Industry observers are united in the agreement that the greatest threat to Pay-TV growth in Nigeria is the absence of appealing channels that could hold viewers captive. Sadly enough, some of these captivating channels can only be found in the DSTV bouquet promoted by MultiChoice. Yet, like their counterparts in the conventional TV Stations, the issue of content and programming have dominated discussions at several fora.

Fayose went further to argue that the debate about the exclusivity of Multi Choice Nigeria over some leading channels is both timid and extremely lame. “Clearly any channel that is on DSTV is always the most lucrative; if it is on the other Pay-TV platforms, it is considered unattractive and non-lucrative”, according to Fayose who claimed that the reason for this is because MultiChoice expends considerable resources, time and effort in marketing and building the brands of the channels on the DSTV bouquets.

The image-maker stated that in the past, MultiChoice had maintained that rights acquisition is carried out through open bidding and wondered why other operators who did not engage in the open bidding when the rights to channels were made available should still accuse the company of unfair practice.

Only late last year, Nigeria's Federal Government acting through the Minister of Information and Communications, Frank Nweke Jnr. took what could pass as the first practical step towards salvaging indigenous Pay-TV operators in the Direct-To-Home business in the country. After many years of prevarication, Abuja eventually broke the yoke of exclusivity in the country's DTH Pay-TV business.

“No licensee shall acquire rights for the territory which presupposes the exclusion of any other Nigerian operator from having opportunity to acquire same”. With these words, the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) eventually aborted what had openly been MultiChoice's over a decade of monopolising the Direct-To-Home Pay-TV sector in Nigeria.Yet, in what looked like a step towards a complete liberalization of the Direct-To-Home cable/satellite TV broadcasting in

 
Nigeria and an apparent declaration of support for competition by the NBC, Information and Communications Minister, Frank Nweke Jnr. had
frowned at the bundling of Nigeria with other countries in matters of broadcast rights, stating that government no longer condoned such practice.

The minister directed the NBC to inform all owners of various foreign channels or contents that had hitherto sold exclusive rights to MultiChoice by bundling Nigeria with other African countries, that the company could no longer buy rights on behalf of the Nigerian nation.

The NBC guidelines therefore, direct that “where existing agreements obtain, upon their lapse, subsequent rights acquisition agreement must designate Nigeria as a stand-alone territory; where exclusive rights exist, the holder shall not be allowed to exploit them except other licensees are given the opportunity to exploit or access them”.

 

Where is the salvation?

But will these steps by both government and the industry regulator salvage the dying Nigerian Pay-TV industry? Is there indeed light at the end of the tunnel for an industry that has witnessed the untimely death of players therein?
Stakeholders in the broadcast industry were virtually united in opinion that the major implication of the government directive is the resuscitation of the indigenous Pay-TV operators seen as the greatest victims of the alleged MultiChoice unwholesome dominance of the industry.

Communication Trends Limited (CTL), operators of Trend TV reacted by commending government for the bold step in reversing the subsisting regime, describing the new measures as a way of creating a level-playing ground for all operators in the industry. “The regulatory agency's action would bring down the price of service in Nigeria as seen in other sectors of the Nigerian economy” the statement signed by CTL media consultant, Christ Nwandu stated.

The situation in other lands

About three years ago in South Africa, similar worries over MultiChoice's practices were addressed by the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), which was later to publish a “Discussion Paper” on an inquiry regarding subscription broadcast rights in South Africa. ICASA embarked on the inquiry to generate comments from industry stakeholders on a proposed introduction of a regulatory framework for the sector.

  In one of its submissions, MultiChoice, which confined itself to exclusivity, insisted, “ultimately, reliance on exclusive programming enhances the contribution of South African subscription broadcasting services to the national economy and to South Africa's ability to remain the hub of broadcasting in Africa.

Any attempt to undermine the principle of exclusivity will have adverse consequences; less investment, lower quality and less content and ultimately a decrease in South Africa's role in African broadcasting”.

The submissions as shown above point to the fact that MultiChoice's intention had been to remain the one and only dominant Pay-TV company in all of Africa. Observers had argued that it is not surprising that the same marketing policy and strategy is adopted in Nigeria by the same South African firm. MuiltiChoice believes strongly that broadcasting is driven by content and programming, and that only stations with appealing contents and programming can survive.

ICASA submitted thereafter that “MultiChoice and M-Net also agreed that exclusivity does not necessarily restrict competition; it might be thought at first blush that exclusive contracts, by their nature, restrict competition. The fact that a contract prevents a provider from supplying another operator might appear, on the fact of it, to restrict competition”.

The report went further to quote MultiChoice and M-Net as submitting that, “First, it is important to distinguish between competition before the contract is signed and after. An exclusive contract restricts competition ex post…. as long as there is sufficient opportunity to compete for the contract itself, the exclusive nature of the contract should not be regarded as anti-competitive”.

Though ICASA claimed readiness to encourage fair competition in broadcasting business in South Africa, it added that it would not allow the industry to be controlled by foreigners.

This is quite a departure from Nigeria's case where MultiChoice is virtually enjoying the franchise of all premium channels. Government has now intervened.

A couple of months ago, Highway Entertainment TV (HITV) entered into the Nigerian Pay-TV market promising to provide Nigerians what they have lacked in other indigenous Pay-TV providers in the country. How far they will go is yet to be seen as others before it had in the past made such promises only to later fall by the way side.

HITV is joining the likes of Disc Communication; Port Harcourt based CMTV, MCL in Aba, ABG in Kaduna and others who have made little or no impact in the business of Pay-TV in Nigeria. Whether the new level-playing platform provided by government will sustain the life span of the local operators can only be decided by time.

 
     
| Home | News | e-Business | Computing & Networking | Telecoms | Broadcasting | About Us | Contact Us |
Copy right © 2007: Compumetrics Solutions Limited: - Website designed by PBG Communications Limited, Tel: 234-803-312-8335;234-1-814-0524 :email-info@pbgcommunications.com